RE: Playing God...[qabalah]
Hello again, Astra:
And in line with the Law of Octave the seven moves into the one, to begin the next octave (level) again. So particular functions could have a number of octaves extending into many levels or dimensions
Yes indeed! And it is examples like this that "speak to me" on the importance of understanding how systems embed within one another, particularly in a self-similar, fractal way. There are lots of great things going on these days with respect to Systems Theory and its integration with concepts of closed-loops and non-linear mathematics. In my view, it is all merely building to a point where the mainstream body of science is eventually going to have to stop ignoring the fact that much of how our "reality" is structured was known eons ago, and encoded in our mystical knowledge. Somewhere along the way it was the religious zealots who "lost the code key" because of their need to control people thru religious enslavement. I am thankful to be able to live in this time... the unveiling of our integrated beingness, both physical and spiritual.
Interesting > For me, as we are defined by the four building blocks of DNA adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine, then they tie in well with the four letter of the Tetragramaton, Yod-Hey-Vav-Hey.... the blueprint of creation.
Also the TOL model with its outer and middle pillars diagrammatically describes the double helix of the DNA
Very good. This last description of yours is precisely the one I was referring to with regard to the triplet codons. The left and right pillars are the sides of the helix, and the central pillar represents the bonding of purine to pyrimidine. In such a model, Malkuth sort of represents the equivalent of an elipsis (...), meaning "repeat this codon sequence, continually." And I also completely agree with your correspondence of A,C, G, and T with I-H-V-H. This ability to codify "everything" in our universe is what quickly attracted me to the TOL neural network pattern.
So would you say mother fractal began with the three Mother letters:
Aleph Shin Mem, the three in one Trinity...the DNA seed being contained in Aleph ?
Another great point! Yes, I would totally agree with this. And now let's look at how that relates to not only the structure of DNA, but of our human body. The following correspondences flow from the placement of Aleph, Mem, and Shin as the 3 horizontal "crossbars" of the upper matrix of the TOL:
1) Our DNA - As I have already mentioned (and we already know), the basis of DNA are amino acids. And the basis of amino acids are the triplet codons which we align with the TOL. Aleph, Mem, and Shin point to the bonds within the triplet codons. These bonds between active and passive (purine and pyrimidine) are (quite literally) the heart of the information code of our DNA. This can, and does, tell us that bonding of polar opposites is the "engine of creation", and these 3 specific bonds we refer to as Aleph, Mem, and Shin generate the diversity of all DNA-based life forms. Therefore, we could say that it takes a complete set of "Aleph-Mem-Shin" to codify a single amino acid. [link= http://www-biol.paisley.ac.uk/courses/stfunmac/glossary/genetic.html ]HERE[/link] is a page that explains the triplet codon phenomenon. Note that it also ties in this coding sequence to the potential for 64 combinations of triplet codons. And what might this relationship of 64 refer to???? How about the 64 trigrams of I Ching? 😉
2) Our Body - When applied to our human bodies, the letters Aleph, Mem, and Shin reveal themselves as the primary "crossbars" of our integrated body system: The head, the chest, and the pelvis. This could be thought of as the "triplet codon sequence" at the level of the human being. And the human being is, of course, the "supersystem" context of our DNA. Furthermore, Sepher Yetzirah gives even greater insight into the allocation of Aleph-Mem-Shin to our bodily functions, when it also correlates them to 3 of the 4 "basi
RE: Playing God...[qabalah]
Hello again Astra:
I wanted to share a wonderful "net find" with you and the others on the board. I've been having a "discussion" at another forum with one who denies the possibility of soul and spirit due to a "lack of proof". This person is also want to deny the inherent trans-systemic relationships of DNA to the human state... and the eventual implications it has to our next highest level of fractal organization.
In researching one of my responses to this person, I ran across the website of John A. Gowan. The following page on Teilhard de Chardin and his concept of the "Noosphere" is but one gem on this website. Gowan's own "4x3" matrix of his fractal algorithm, and his "Energy Tetrahedon" correlations for modern physics are perfectly aligned with the TOL. Surprise, surprise! 😉
[link= http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/jag8/chardin.html ]Teilhard de Chardin - Prophet of the Information Age[/link]
Enjoy all!
THM
RE: Playing God...[qabalah]
To astra: You make a good point about the classifications of life but there is a thought that perhaps might make you re-evaluate the situation.
For the longest time we did not believe anything was alive until it was closer to our kingdom of classification. We've since debunked this to the extent that if something grows it has life. Now thats just science.
A book called Life Comes From Life which was the recordings of walks taken with a swami master if I am correct, and his conversations with his followers as well as a few guests. There was a section where one asks the swami, "Scientists believe there is no life on the moon" asking him his thoughts on the matter. He replies "Those rascals, they think that life only means the life that they know in their perception." He continues to explain that all comes from the one. All things.
This has always been my personal belief as well. All things are comprised of energy, table grass, people, cars, whatever. Its all just energy, Energy is motion and motion proves power or intent, this to me means life.
The computer is also like this. Yes right now it merely reacts to its programming, well so does the single celled organism. Its just that the single celled organism's programmer happens to be the same thing that created us, God Brahma, Ein Sof, whatever you wish to call it. This computer is life because its energy was comprised from the programming or "nature" that it was given, even humans have their own programming, its just we have been built as advanced model to these single celled organisms and now can re-write our own programming or develop methods of medicine to repair our own hardware.
Machines are getting closer and closer to this all the time. Has anyone heard of toyotas little robot ? I believe it was toyota but Ive seen this thing and read articles about it. Normally robotics were given specific instructions to go left or go right when necessary. This robot chooses which way to go. It may not be self aware, YET. However when it comes to an obstacle in its path, it doesnt read of prime directives or instructions for its path around. Its programmed with a vague nature that allows it to analyze the obstacle by cameras in its face and sensors on its hands and it makes a judgment on which way to move around.
That to me sounds like the equivalent of a more advanced organism that still acts on the nature of its programmer whether god or human but has a bit more awareness on its own without control.
Math is the language of nature and we are advancing it more and more each day. In mathematics there are clauses and equations that allow for variables to be inputed and outputed. Meaning that one day we can give these "machines" a nature and it will have a choice and it will become self aware.
What is our own biology if not an advanced machine ? Computers themselves were built on the ideology of a human being. Its processor is the brain, its storage is the neural pathway, its electric buses are the circulatory system carrying information or compositions like blood cells throughout the body from the heart which is the system command processor that takes care of not data but basic functions like our own involuntary bodily functions.
We are only playing god. We mimick our creator through our creations. As God continued to build us in more advanced models, so do we build better computers until one day those computers will think for themselves.
All things are life, inanimate objects have energy and therefor power. Our own power of awareness can even animate these objects.
Give a car a name and talk to it, suddenly it develops a personality and does certain things at certain times. We give it power because life comes from life.