RE: Playing God...[qabalah]
I saw Bladerunner a long time ago when I worked for a video store. I honestly was very bored so I dont remember anything more than Harrison Ford and that guy who plays a lot of B action flicks.
I have a deeper understanding of film from a productive standpoint so maybe I should watch it again someday but I dont think id ever really enjoy it
RE: Playing God...[qabalah]
😀 No worries Zophiel,,
If we all liked the same 'stuff' we'd all be queing up for the same partner!
Rgds,
Roger
RE: Playing God...[qabalah]
ORIGINAL: Leonardo
I have printed out he entire thread, for further reading and thanks Astra for that brilliant use of the facility to include graphics in 'Science... ' posts. It makes my negotiations with Mike worth while.Leo
You're very welcome Leo 🙂
x
RE: Playing God...[qabalah]
Hi Human Matrix
I hope we can continue to discuss and share in mutual learning of the TOL, your encouraging words are very welcome.
And thank you for clarifying the seven levels within the OSI-RM
The TOL does seem to describe this process and as you know the seven organisational levels can be found in any functioning system that has potential wholeness (mini cosmoses).
And in line with the Law of Octave the seven moves into the one, to begin the next octave (level) again. So particular functions could have a number of octaves extending into many levels or dimensions, as is borne out here:
Note how the highest OSI layer is the "application layer", which specifically relates to the Creative Will allocation of Kether in Atziluth
As I don't have knowledge of computer systems I'm not able to expand this discussion from the TOL point of view but I can 'follow' up to a point.
2) Another DNA-TOL correlation is the fact that triplet-codon sequences that form the basic amino acids in DNA overlay the 3x3 TOL matrix of the upper, non-physical nodes of the Tree. Each triangle on the Tree represents a pairing of one purine and one pyrimadine and their mutual energy bond that holds them together. Strings of triplet codon sequences link together to "spell out" the entire DNA double-helix.
Interesting > For me, as we are defined by the four building blocks of DNA adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine, then they tie in well with the four letter of the Tetragramaton, Yod-Hey-Vav-Hey.... the blueprint of creation.
Also the TOL model with its outer and middle pillars diagrammatically describes the double helix of the DNA
3) Thus, our human body and our DNA are self-similar (fractally structured), with the "mother fractal" that describes life at all levels being the TOL itself.
So would you say mother fractal began with the three Mother letters:
Aleph Shin Mem, the three in one Trinity...the DNA seed being contained in Aleph ?
Another interesting correspondence, speaking of birth: Interesting how the human gestation cycle is Nine months in length, and progresses from Kether (Will to Procreate) all the way through Yesod (Foundation gives Birth)
Human gestation tends to cover ten lunar months, 40 weeks or 280 days so birth could be seen to occur in Malkulth, the tenth sephirot ?
'Good to talk' HM...hope to catch you soon.
astra
x
RE: Playing God...[qabalah]
Hi Zophiel
The theory is that when we create an android, this android will be obviously connected to the internet ............
What if the android is so self aware and being given the information of past machines like him. What if it woke up and called us gods having known us all the time.
Meaning, these machines, the ones now, though they are mere calculators in some resepects, what if they are conscious on their own level ? We just havent developed them into beings that can communicate in the same way we do with ourselves. If we are made in the image of the creator and reflect our creator in our own creations, its almost feasible that the machine im using now is not unlike an amoeba or single celled bacteria.
The only way that an android can become self aware is for it to be en-souled, a privilege only bestowed by the Holy One on Adam Kadmon (mankind), who is the emanation of the Divine image.
Single cells have more of a chance to develop consciousness if they carry the potential DNA blueprint and if they are on the right evolutionary path but a machine does not have that potential, imo.
We have machines that upgrade their own software, thats a type of evolution if you think about it. Soon machines will be able to make other machines without us telling them to do so.. would that not be reproduction ?
Machines are only as good as what is programmed into them. We the "gods" devise and create the programs so their intelligence will be dependent on how evolved we become.
High computer maths may independently evolve within the programming, so the machines may appear more intelligent but without consciousness there will be no understanding, direction or motive.
(BTW I'm only referring to machines that we create here in this reality, can't speak for any possible inter-dimensional android beings!!)
best wishes
astra