Cancer

PJ7 · 2013-09-03T18:31:09Z

I have put up extracts of this paper,and thought better for people to have the whole- Graviola Today, the future of cancer treatment and the chances of survival look more promising than ever. There's a healing tree that grows deep within the Amazon rain forest in South America that could literally change how you, your doctor, and possibly the rest of the world think about curing cancer. With extracts from this powerful tree, it may now be possible to... * conquer cancer safely and effectively with an all-natural therapy that doesn't cause extreme nausea, weight loss, and hair loss * protect your immune system and evade deadly infections * feel strong and healthy throughout the course of treatment * boost your energy and improve your outlook on life Through a series of confidential communications involving a researcher from one of America's largest pharmaceutical companies, this ancient tree's anticancerous properties have recently come to light. Although not yet tested in human trials, the tree has been studied in more than 20 laboratory tests since the 1970s, where it's been shown to: * Effectively target and kill malignant cells in 12 different types of cancer, including colon, breast, prostate, lung, and pancreatic cancer * be 10,000 times stronger in killing colon cancer cells than Adriamycin, a commonly used chemotherapeutic drug * selectively hunt down and kill cancer cells without harming healthy cells, unlike chemotherapy. So why isn't every health publication extolling the benefits of this treatment? Why hasn't it been made widely available throughout the natural-medicine community? And, if it's only half as promising as it appears to be, why isn't every oncologist at every major hospital insisting on using it on all his patients? Especially when you consider that since the early 1990s, extensive independent research--including research by one of today's leading drug companies and by the National Cancer Institute--confirms that the tree's chemical extracts attack and destroy cancer cells with lethal precision. Graviola is 10,000 times stronger in killing colon cancer than Adriamycin, a commonly used chemotherapeutic drug. The answer to these difficult questions can only be explained by recounting a disturbing story we recently uncovered. More than anything else we've reported on this year, the story of this Amazon cancer treatment reinforces the need for groups like HSI and illustrates how easily our options for medical treatment are controlled by money and power. News of this amazing tree was nearly lost forever A confidential source, whose account we've been able to independently confirm, revealed that a billion-dollar drug company in the United States tried for nearly seven years to synthesize two of the tree's most powerful anti cancerous chemicals. In the early 1990s, behind lock and key, this well-known drug giant began searching for a cure for cancer--while preciously guarding their opportunity to patent it and, therefore, profit from it. Research focused on a legendary healing tree called Graviola. Parts of the tree--including the bark, leaves, roots, fruit, and fruit seeds--had been used for centuries by medicine men and native Indians in South America to treat heart disease, asthma, liver problems, and arthritis. Going on little documented scientific evidence, the company poured money and resources into testing Graviola's anticancerous properties--and they were shocked by the results. Graviola was a cancer-killing dynamo. But that's where the story of Graviola nearly ended. The pharmaceutical company had a big problem. They'd spent years trying to isolate and create man-made duplicates of two of the tree's most powerful chemicals. But they'd hit a brick wall. They couldn't replicate the original. And they couldn't sell the tree extract itself profitably-because federal law mandates that natural substances can't be patented. That meant the company couldn't protect its profits on the project it had poured millions of dollars and nearly seven years of research into. As the dream of big profits evaporated, testing on Graviola came to a screeching halt After seven frustrating years and without the promise of lucrative sales, the company shelved the project and refused to publish its findings in an independent journal. But one responsible researcher struggled with the decision. While understanding the company's goal of profits, he couldn't accept the decision to hide this unique cancer killer from the world. Following his conscience and risking his career, he contacted, a company dedicated to harvesting plants from the Amazon. As a result, the company went into high gear and began to research related studies published on Graviola. They discovered that several other teams in the United States (in addition to that of the drug company) had been testing Graviola in vitro (in test tubes). The results supported the drug company's secret findings; Graviola had been shown to kill cancer cells. Encourag...

Page 2 / 2 Prev

Cancer

Last Post by PJ7 13 years ago

17 Posts

5 Users

0 Reactions

3,659 Views

RSS

Tashanie

(@tashanie)

Posts: 1924

Noble Member

To all the sufferer of cancer, my heart goes out to you and I hope you find a cure that will help you.

So do we all

If you look back through this thread and others I have introduced, you will realize how defensive to stop me by so many people, from releasing this knowledge to people, and how many are trying to stop me from letting you know, with the pretext of it hasn't been proven, what more proof do they want, other than people who have been sent home to die are now cancer free?
I am not trying to stop the information getting out. I just want to make sure people make an INFORMED choice

I do not want to give anyone false hope, just that there is other help God has given us to try as well,

These alternative cures were here long before the pharmaceutical company's..

Peace and light
Peter

You may be interested to know there is a bill before parliament called the 'medical innovation bill' which it is hoped will give doctors more confidence to use innovative treatments in cancer especially. The idea is that as long as patient and doctor both consent they can step outside the recommended treatments and use innovative treatments. The bill gives the doctor protection from being sued if I understand it correctly.

Posted : 13/09/2013 9:03 am

PJ7

(@pj7)

Posts: 227

Reputable Member

Topic starter

You may be interested to know there is a bill before parliament called the 'medical innovation bill' which it is hoped will give doctors more confidence to use innovative treatments in cancer especially. The idea is that as long as patient and doctor both consent they can step outside the recommended treatments and use innovative treatments. The bill gives the doctor protection from being sued if I understand it correctly.

I do not think that the medical innovation bill' that you mention will help, I may be a bit of an optimist but I feel it is probably too little too late.

And I feel that the drug companies are more in power over the doctors than the government, I'm afraid my faith is not in the government, or the FDA, but in God.

Perhaps if they removed a lot of the causes of cancer, such as GM, or made people aware of the preventative methods out there, such as B-17, instead of giving doctors protection against being sued.

Peace and light
Peter

Posted : 13/09/2013 1:53 pm

Page 2 / 2 Prev

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Cancer

Contact Healthy Pages

About Healthy Pages