You should know the answer to that already.:):)
and of course I do! 😀
Someone recently said that when hospital beds are empty loads of people are out of business.............so why do things that make people healthy??
The doctor who was treating my friend with chemo KNEW she was doing something else as she just kept getting better and the cancer was clearing up.....not what he expected!! BUT he wasn't even interested in knowing what it was.....he just said "Whatevre you are doing, keep doing it" end of story..........she got well.
Discussion via reported posts in TUD https://www.healthypages.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=608411#post608411
PLEASE DELETE THIS POST IF REINSTATED
It would certainly be worth trying,It is cyanide and explodes when it comes into contact with cancer cells....or otherwise just passes out of the body. There is a certain cure for cancer via this method and it has been known about for 35 years or so..........keeping very quiet for some reason though!!!
Just to be certain.... you are claiming a certain cure for cancer?
David:)
We all need to do personal research, have personal experiences and make out own decisions. There is enough information out there to prove that there is a cure for cancer, and I have seen it work, so my doubts have gone.
Mammograms CAUSE breast cancer in women, and then they are recommended to have chemo, and so the plan goes on.
I'd love to know the source of this information, as I've mentioned elsewhere, Mammograms DONT CAUSE BREAST CANCER. A woman or man has a mammogram when a lump or change is detected. Or that person is of a certain age when mammograms are rountinely offered as part of a health check. This is because a mammogram is a diagnostic tool, if the cancer cells are there they usually are seen (but not always - depends on the type) - it is just a name of a particular type of xray machine. Before anyone says - natural radiation is all around us all the time.
Fudge
I am not actually claimaing anything either way, butthisis an interesting read on mammography, especially paragraph 5.
Having your breasts squeezed into a machine is not normal and having it done every year at that even worse.
Philip Day's books mention mammograms and their link to cancer.
A woman or man has a mammogram when a lump or change is detected
A woman after a certain age is advised to have a mammogram every year regardless of whether there is a lump or not.
I gave up having mamograms years ago after having my first one!! It was painful.
Same with what would happen if I was found to have cancer.... no way would I have the chemo or the radiotherapy. I would go for the results I have seen by using the natural methods and take my chances!
moderators hat on
The Healthypages moderating team would like to remind everybody that the views expressed on the forums are those of individuals and not those of the Healthypages site itself.
We would also remind members that in many countries, including the UK, it is in fact illegal to make claims of "cure" via any method of complementary/holistic/natural method and most certainly illegal to make claim of cures for cancer. Therefore, it is advised that members refrain from using the word "cure" or making claims of "cure" when discussing matters on public forums.
We understand that this particular topic is an emotive one and that some people may have found benefit from methods other than orthodox medicine, to the point that their original condition may no longer exist, but we do ask that care is taken when choosing your wording, for your own benefit.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
moderators hat off
We have lost family members who had cancer and went on to have chemo, then died within weeks of treatment.
But I have also heard of people who have made full recoveries after chemo.
Personally I wouldnt have chemo, I made my decision when I felt a lump, I was scared. But before my appointment came through my decision was made, absolutely no chemo and no mammogram either.
The lump was checked out using ultrasound and turned out to be normal tissue.
At the end of the day for me it is chemo v nature and each of us are entitled to make a decision and be supported whichever choice is made.
http://www.naturalnews.com/027641_mammograms_brst_cancer.html
Really interesting post of mammograms.
Hi Louisa
Yes, I have made a similar decision. I saw what chemo did to my brother and it didn't stop it spreading. If I knew then what I know now, I would have explained the route I'd take and then he'd have been able to make his own choice. As it was he was no other obvious choice and he is no longer with us. Whether the alternative route would have saved him we'll never know, but he'd have had a far more comfortable passage - I was shocked at the effect the chemo had on him.
A healthy diet and lifestyle is paramount to supporting one' immune system, ensuring regular juicing when it's under pressure.
Just had a look at the article and it didnt emphasise that the women who were having mamograms at an early age were being screened because their famillies had a history of breast cancer and were more likely to have breast cancer themselves, hence finding out that they did have it.
This article didnt mention the squeezing of breast also agrivates the cells, which other articles have done so in their words, increasing the spread of cancerous cells! For info cancer spreads via your lymph and blood systems, it is your bodys auto-immune system which is overwhelmed by the duplication of the cancer cells whatever type you have.
I believe that everyone has a 50/50 chance of getting anything, if your immune system is low. The more I read about acidity being high or low, leads me to conclude that this may, and I stress may have an effect on how your body fights back (you need to aim for low, via a health diet).
Finally to all those HP's who have lost friends and familly due to cancers of any kind, they have at least tried to help not only themselves but those who have been left behind, by using the methods we have today has helped to understand how the cancers spread and they were brave enough to at least try, which in some people stopped the cancer but in others sadly it didnt.
Fudge
Unfortunately, Fudge, there are many that will disagree with your statement. Google, at your leisure, 'mammograms cancer'. There are 11,800,000 entries and as with most things, there are pros and cons. Having said that, take special note of how many rads a woman will experience over a period of 20 years, the cumulative effect of radiation (it doesn't just go away), and how the latest findings are telling women to limit their exposure to radiation and how it has caused such a furor in the for profit cancer industry.
I feel you are absolutely correct about acidity in cancer patients-I was one of them. You can Google that, too. Doesn't it make you wonder ,sometimes, how there has NEVER been ANY natural product approved for ANYTHING with regard to cancer? Dr. Linus Pauling was ridiculed for his stand on Vit-C, although it was found to eradicate scurvy from this planet. There are so many others who suffer the same fate as he. I guess I am called a cancer survivor, but I really don't like that term. It has connotations of 'hanging on for dear life' and that could not be farther from the truth. I am in the best health and condition of my life. I am getting back into running condition after arthroscopic surgery-only doing a mile or so per day. Natural healing goes under a microscope daily while chemo runs rough-shod over it with absolutely no proof of it's effectiveness.
kcat