St Germain on Londo...
 
Notifications
Clear all

St Germain on London Bombings

19 Posts
12 Users
0 Reactions
1,937 Views
Posts: 1410
(@moonfeather)
Noble Member
Joined: 22 years ago

RE: St Germain on London Bombings

Thanks for the link, Talisman. Well, I'll go back and have a read when I've more time, but the pics that Venitian's friend was outraged about... okay, they're gay men, or aimed at gays, one would presume. Edwin does appear to be gay himself, from one comment about his partner, so... such images would be okay to his eyes - or those of another gay man. They do nowt for me, but then, some other spiritual art does little for me either.

I remain open and not offended. I'm more offended by some of the tat which passes for spiritual teachings and is nothing of the kind! 😀

Moonfeather


Reply
Posts: 14
(@fraterj)
Active Member
Joined: 21 years ago

RE: St Germain on London Bombings

Thanks Talisman. I wasn't offended either ... but the first page I looked at, Channellings "A Year of Change" consisted of huge paragraphs and wide lines of black characters against a grey background. I could hardly read it. If you know him maybe you could let him know people can hardly see what he's written.


Reply
Posts: 6417
(@tigerbee)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 23 years ago

RE: St Germain on London Bombings

interesting perception of the pictures, what V takes to be soft porn i just take to be pictures of men with no sexual inuendo, yes they are softened images but then these are angel images and so if a man is to be portrayed in that way a softer more feminine side is usually shown... each to their own.

T
x


Reply
Posts: 1410
(@moonfeather)
Noble Member
Joined: 22 years ago

RE: St Germain on London Bombings

BTW everyone, check out Venetian's friend's art - absolutely gorgeous spiritual works!

Moonfeather


Reply
Venetian
Posts: 10423
(@venetian)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 23 years ago

RE: St Germain on London Bombings

Hi all,

Just to make clear that I'm not offended by such very mild 'porn' - and so mild it's maybe not the right term. Erotic photos? Nor am I anti-gay. To me the point was simply that these are representations of the Archangels.

I believe in the Archangels and have sufficient respect for them that I wouldn't suggest that any of them are bare-chested young men in scruffy jeans with a crotch-bulge, as one of the pics is for instance. [&:] (Now the hits to Edwin's site increase by 150% :D!) Think of it as if you know someone, and you don't want the person you know to be misrepresented. So you speak out for them. I posted in that frame of mind.

ORIGINAL: Moonfeather

BTW everyone, check out Venetian's friend's art - absolutely gorgeous spiritual works!

He is very talented, but most of the art there is not his. It's an honour to know him, and his own paintings on that site are just the Alpha (male) and Omega (female) Portraits of The Presence, the 'Ark' which has them both, the painting of Kuthumi, and this which was originally by one of the well-known Pre-Raphaelite artists, but my friend has re-done it as his own large painting, and added better colours and more detail:

[DLMURL] [/DLMURL]

Venetian


Reply
Page 3 / 4
Share: