2nd May 2012, 04:59 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 967
|
Quote:
|
I have been teaching Reiki for over 15 years. I have seen organisations that seek to regulate or institutionalise Reiki come and go. I have seen some requirements for registration that Mrs Takata would not fulfill. So I do worry that something precious is lost when people seek to institutionalise the teaching relationship and its content. My classes differ one from another as a different group of people have different requirements and different questions. The essence of Reiki teaching is in the relationship and the responsibilities of initiator and student and not in some 'statutory curriculum'. I feel this kind of registration activity may be prejudicial to my students and discriminate against them Nanny state again!
|
The NOS and core curriculum were developed with respect for Reiki and the many different forms of Reiki. They specifically only cover the aspects related to how a practitioner works with the public and offer best practice for the benefit of clients and Reiki as a whole. The actual Reiki itself is not prescribed and practitioners and teachers are free to use and teach their form of Reiki without interference. Reiki was, is and will remain a personal journey, but the interaction with the public is being regulated to ensure client protection. The registration process really only applies to practitioners in professional practice and/or working in the NHS.
|
|
|
Learn about therapies
and find a therapist